![]() Metro by T-Mobile service doesn’t just work on phones you buy from the carrier. Beginning around 80 for two lines, Metro by T-Mobile really shows its prepaid chops once you reach four lines for 120, which includes unlimited data, 100 GB of Google One cloud storage, 15 GB of hotspot data, an Amazon Prime membership, and video streams at up to 480p. Have a phone you love? Metro by T-Mobile service specialists can “flash” it to the Metro by T-Mobile network. All of our Voice & Data plans include: Fast, nationwide 5G. If you need a cell phone, but don’t want any of the associated hassle, skip the contract and head straight to Metro by T-Mobile. Unlimited talk, text, & picture messages in the U.S. Potential savings if you qualify for the Affordable Connectivity Program. ![]() 5G requires a compatible device and is not available everywhere. I used to be on fire back when it was called project Fi and it was great for cost savings. Skip the outrageous monthly fees when you add Metro by T-Mobile coupon codes to your next order. One line is 50, 2 lines are 80, 3 lines are 90, and 4 lines are 100, with each line receiving unlimited data at up to LTE speeds on handset. But as my kids got older and we needed unlimited data, I switched to Metro for four lines for 120. AF is faster than the 24-200mm, and the build appears to be a bit better, and while it is sharper, the difference isn't all that great in most cases.That includes Amazon prime and also 100 GB of Android one storage per line and the cost is 120 including taxes out the door. ![]() I returned it, and bought the 24-120mm, and have been quite happy with it, it performed very well during an outdoor shoot in -24 weather, about a week before Xmas. However I am willing to give them up when it comes to Wide Angle, but since less than 1% of my shooting is less than 28mm. I guess someone will say to shoot the 70-200 in DX mode, but I really don't want to give up all those pixels. The missing 200-300mm range wasn't so bad as the 28-300 had a fair bit of Bloom and was a bit optimistic on the actually Focal Length. However I found it to be slower, and while the combined IBIS and VR, allowed for some very slow shutter speeds(shake free at 1/2sec at 200mm). In most cases it was quite a bit better, and certainly didn't have all the Purple Fringing the 28-300 had. I had got the 24 - 200mm, as a Walk-about Lens, to replace the 28-300mm I had bought 8 yrs ago. I just ordered the 24-120 and should get it next week I will probably keep the 24-70 at least for a while, since resale value is low, and may end up keeping it when I want a smaller more compact lens, for street photography or for situations where I don't want to carry expensive lenses. While I like the images I get from the 24-70, 70mm is just not enough reach for me, so the 24-200 lives on my Z6 more. ![]() I have the 24-70 f4 and the 24-200 and have been very interested in the 24-120 f4. But for 45mp shooters, this is a killer multipurpose lens that gives up very little to most primes when shot at f/4 and above. For those who'd really miss 200mm or have a 24mp camera, it could be the logical pick at nearly half the price on the used market. I wish it had the zoom lock feature of the 24-200 for hiking. Overall for most situations, I think the 24-120 is a superior lens. I haven't compared the two enough to see if there is a noticeable difference in VR vs IBIS performance. The 24-120 is noticeably better at close focusing, and really extends the shooting window for me as far as close ups go. While the 24-200 is best shot at f/8, I have no qualms about shooting the 24-120 wide open across the range.īeyond that, I find the size/weight difference between the Z 24-120 and 24-200 absolutely negligible, they take up a very similar amount of space in a bag. It's much better than the F 24-120, particularly above 85mm, and quite shockingly better in the corners at 120mm. ![]() It's generally superior to the 24-200, without any of the purple fringing, and better performance into the corners. I was intrigued by reports of just how good the Z 24-120 is, and now that they're more readily available, I picked one up. The 24-200 generally held up better sharpness into the corners, with the only trade-off being a bit of purple fringing that could be edited out in post. When I got the Z7 I compared the Z 24-200 to the F 24-120mm, and found no focal length where the older lens was better. I owned the F 24-120/4 for a number of years and really enjoyed the lens, even if the corners were soft above 70mm, it took great portraits at 120/4. Happy Z7 owner, been using the 24-200 for over a year, but recently picked up a 24-120. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |